Self-Representation (Faretta/Pro Se) Evaluations
Assessing a defendant’s ability to waive counsel and proceed pro se.
Courts must ensure that defendants who wish to represent themselves knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waive counsel. Referrals occur when there is doubt about decisional capacity, cognitive impairment, or severe mental illness that may impair the ability to conduct a defense.
What you receive
Understanding of charges, potential penalties, and courtroom procedures
Appreciation of the risks and disadvantages of self‑representation
Capacity to organize a defense, make strategic decisions, question witnesses, and conform to courtroom decorum
Application of Dusky, Faretta, and Indiana v. Edwards standards, recognizing that courts may require a higher level of decisional capacity for self‑representation than for trial competence
Our Process
-
We examine legal filings, mental‑health history, and any prior competency evaluations.
-
We assess cognitive and decisional capacities, focusing on understanding of legal rights and procedures.
-
We consult with counsel and review court transcripts or jail logs to assess behavior, when possible.
-
Our report integrates legal standards. Timelines vary depending on court schedules and case complexity; please contact us to discuss scheduling. Testimony is provided upon request.
FAQs
-
Yes. Courts may permit reappointment of counsel at their discretion.
-
They may be combined or ordered separately, depending on the court’s questions.
-
Yes, we can assess capacities related to waiving other constitutional rights when requested.
-
Timelines vary depending on the case and court requirements. Please contact us to discuss expected timeframes.