Juvenile Evaluations
Protecting due process for youth under Welfare & Institutions Code §709 and §707.
Juvenile delinquency proceedings must be suspended if substantial evidence raises a doubt that the minor lacks sufficient present ability to consult with counsel or a rational and factual understanding of the nature of the charges or proceedings (WIC §709, Rule of Court 5.645). Transfer (fitness) hearings under WIC §707 and Rule of Court 5.770 determine whether a youth should be tried as an adult.
What you receive
Assessment of factual and rational understanding of adjudication, courtroom roles, and potential consequences
Evaluation of developmental maturity, mental illness, developmental disability, or immaturity affecting competence
Recommendations regarding competency restoration when appropriate
Analysis of transfer factors (seriousness of offense, sophistication, prior delinquency, maturity level, prospects for rehabilitation, public‑safety risk)
Use of standardized instruments (e.g., Juvenile Adjudicative Competence Interview, SAVRY, RSTI)
Our Process
-
We examine the petition, arrest records, school assessments, mental‑health and medical files, and prior competency opinions.
-
We assess the youth’s understanding of legal proceedings and capacity to assist counsel.
-
We consult with defense counsel, caregivers, teachers, and treatment providers to verify developmental history and current functioning.
-
We use juvenile‑specific instruments like the JACI and SAVRY.
-
The report integrates statutory criteria, case law, and developmental science. Timelines vary depending on court requirements and case complexity; please contact us for details. We testify as needed.
FAQs
-
Yes. Developmental immaturity can render a child unable to assist in their defense.
-
Seriousness of the offense, sophistication of the act, prior delinquency, maturity, prospects for rehabilitation, and public‑safety risk.
-
Yes. We recommend competency restoration programs, therapy, and educational interventions as needed.
